Jackson v. Rose
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- State ex rel. Billings v. Friedland (Ohio 2000)
- Kirklin v. Enlow (Ohio 2000)
- Kirklin v. Enlow (Ohio 2000)
- State ex rel. Billings v. Friedland (Ohio 2000)
- State v. Friedland, Unpublished Decision (9-16-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
- State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell (Ohio 1999)
- State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell (Ohio 1999)
- State ex rel. Larkins v. Aurelius (Ohio 1998)
- State ex rel. Larkins v. Aurelius (Ohio 1998)
- State ex rel. Collins v. Leonard (Ohio 1997)
- Jackson v. Rose (Ohio 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Jackson asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. As the court of appeals held, however, the failure to comply with R.C. 2945.05 may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction. State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus. A claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief. 74 Ohio St.3d at 339, 658 N.E.2d at 770.
Based on the foregoing, the court of appeals properly dismissed Jackson’s habeas corpus petition. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.