Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1997

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 25, 1997 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
79 Ohio St. 3d 113; 679 N.E.2d 1096

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for twenty-four months, but twelve months of that suspension are stayed, provided that during *115the two-year period respondent comply with the conditions recommended by the board. Costs are taxed to the respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑