Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1997

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 25, 1997 · Cook, Credit, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Served, Stratton, Sweeney, Would
79 Ohio St. 3d 115; 679 N.E.2d 1098

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. We hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year with credit for time served since his interim suspension was imposed. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Resnick, J., dissent because they would not give respondent credit for time served. Cook, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑