Ohio Supreme Court, 1997

State ex rel. Okocha v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 6, 1997 · Dougeas, Hold, Moyer, Respondents, Response, Stratton

79 Ohio St. 3d 1412; 679 N.E.2d 1138; 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1853

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Okocha (Ohio 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed sua sponte.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would hold for response. Dougeas, J., would hold for a response from respondents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.