Ohio Supreme Court, 1997

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 9, 1997 · Pfeifer

79 Ohio St. 3d 1495; 683 N.E.2d 1150; 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2477

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat (Ohio 1998)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat (Ohio 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

This matter is pending before the court upon the filing by respondent of a motion for reconsideration.

*1496Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and is, hereby, granted, and that respondent’s suspension is made coextensive with his new federal probationary period that ended July 22, 1997. It is further ordered by the court, sua sponte, that respondent may seek reinstatement to the practice of law by filing an application for reinstatement pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 189, 680 N.E.2d 972.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.