Ruge v. Conrad

Ohio Supreme Court
Ruge v. Conrad, 1998 Ohio 536 (Ohio 1998)
84 Ohio St. 3d 1220

Ruge v. Conrad

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 1220.]

RUGE, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. CONRAD, ADMR., ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS; NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Ruge v. Conrad, 1998-Ohio-536.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 97-2328—Submitted October 14, 1998 at the Mercer County Session— Decided December 30, 1998.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clark County, No. 97CA0015. __________________ Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy, Marc J. Jaffy and Eric S. Bravo, for appellant and cross-appellee. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michael A. Vanderhorst, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees and cross-appellants Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, and Industrial Commission. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Joseph A. Brunetto, for appellee Navistar International Transportation Corp. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. {¶ 2} The court orders that the court of appeals’ opinion not be published in the Ohio Official Reports, and that it may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

__________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 3} I respectfully dissent from the decision to dismiss this case as improvidently allowed and, if addressing this case on the merits, would affirm the decision of the court of appeals. __________________

2

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.