State ex rel. Karl v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Karl v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 111.]
THE STATE EX REL. KARL, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.
[Cite as State ex rel. Karl v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-564.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-555—Submitted October 12, 1998—Decided December 9, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD12-1774. __________________ M. Blake Stone, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steven K. Aronoff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. Rademaker, Matty, McClelland & Greve and Lynn G. Murphy, for appellee D-A Lubricant Co., Inc. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.