State v. Tennyson
State v. Tennyson
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 49.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. TENNYSON, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Tennyson, 1998-Ohio-680.] Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook—Court of appeals directed to lift stay of execution of sentence. (No. 98-1127—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided December 2, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-970445. __________________ Jonathan P. Dameron, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570. {¶ 2} The court of appeals is directed to lift the stay of execution of sentence. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook—Court of appeals directed to lift stay of execution of sentence.