State v. Davis

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 40.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. DAVIS, APPELLANT.

[Cite as State v. Davis, 1998-Ohio-675.] Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook. (No. 98-1343—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided December 2, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, Nos. 97APA08-1020 and

97APA08-1021. __________________

Ronald J. O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Amy H. Kulesa, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Stephen M. Straus, for appellant.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

__________________