State v. Sunnycalb
State v. Sunnycalb
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 26.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SUNNYCALB, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Sunnycalb, 1998-Ohio-702.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook. (No. 98-483—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No. CA97-05-100. __________________ John F. Holcomb, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Daniel G. Eichel and Daniel J. Gattermeyer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee.
Jeffrey L. Sunnycalb, pro se. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.