Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Derivan

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 1216.]

BUTLER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. DERIVAN. [Cite as Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Derivan, 1998-Ohio-546.] (No. 97-2259—Submitted and decided November 24, 1998.)

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent H.T. Derivan, a.k.a. Hubert Thomas Derivan, Attorney Registration No. 0006092, last known business address in Middletown, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 1, 1998, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that H.T. Derivan, a.k.a. Hubert Thomas Derivan, be and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Derivan (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 300, 691 N.E.2d 256. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________