State ex rel. Singer v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Singer v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 548.]
THE STATE EX REL. SINGER, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Singer v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-13.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-266—Submitted September 15, 1998—Decided November 10, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD09-1199. __________________ Fell, Marcus & Koder Co., L.P.A., and George N. Fell II, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Mark S. Barnes and Reeve W. Kelsey, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., DISSENTING. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for compliance with State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.