State ex rel. Montgomery v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Montgomery v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 436.]
THE STATE EX REL. MONTGOMERY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE, ET AL.
[Cite as State ex rel. Montgomery v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-37.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 97-2637—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 28, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD12-1749. __________________ Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jonathan A. Good, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., separately dissent. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission pursuant to State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.