State ex rel. Crosby v. Orient Dev. Ctr.
State ex rel. Crosby v. Orient Dev. Ctr.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 434.]
THE STATE EX REL. CROSBY, APPELLANT, v. ORIENT DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Crosby v. Orient Dev. Ctr., 1998-Ohio-33.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-112—Submitted September 15, 1998—Decided October 28, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD11-1517. __________________ Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jonathan A. Good, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.