State ex rel. Zamudio v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Zamudio v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 62 (Ohio 1998)
83 Ohio St. 3d 394

State ex rel. Zamudio v. Indus. Comm.

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 394.]

THE STATE EX REL. ZAMUDIO, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Zamudio v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-62.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed. (No. 97-1861—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 14, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD10-1375. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Roetzel & Andress and Douglas M. Kennedy, for appellee Hancock Hogs, Inc. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would affirm the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment reversed.