State ex rel. Metal Seal & Products, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Metal Seal & Products, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 376.]
THE STATE EX REL. METAL SEAL & PRODUCTS, INC., APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Metal Seal & Products, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. Ohio, 1998-Ohio-84.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-570—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 14, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD02-238. __________________ Willacy, LoPresti & Marcovy and Timothy A. Marcovy, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Cheryl J. Nester, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation. Wincek & DeRosa Co., L.P.A., and Christopher G. Wincek, for appellee Barbara Brewster. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concur in part and dissent in part. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals on the issue of wage-loss compensation, and affirm on all other issues. MOYER, C.J., concurs in the foregoing opinion. __________________
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.