State ex rel. Heard v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Heard v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 288 (Ohio 1998)
83 Ohio St. 3d 358

State ex rel. Heard v. Indus. Comm.

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 358.]

THE STATE EX REL. HEARD, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Heard v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-288.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 97-1342—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 14, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD07-883. __________________ Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy, Marc J. Jaffy and Eric S. Bravo, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William D. Haders, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
Workers' compensation—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed.