State ex rel. Iafelice v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Iafelice v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 331.]
THE STATE EX REL. IAFELICE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Iafelice v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-107.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-37—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 7, 1998.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 94APD12-1767. __________________ Alan I. Goodman, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis L. Hufstader, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.
Licata & Crosby Co., L.P.A., Elizabeth A. Crosby and Terence K. O’Brien, for appellee Owner’s Management Co. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.