State ex rel. Libecap v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Libecap v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 178.]
THE STATE EX REL. LIBECAP, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS.
[Cite as State ex rel. Libecap v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-120.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2352—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided September 23, 1998.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD01-29. __________________ Hochman & Roach Co., L.P.A., and Gary D. Plunkett, for appellee.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steven P. Fixler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.
MOYER, C.J., dissents.
COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.