State ex rel. United Screw & Bolt Corp. v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. United Screw & Bolt Corp. v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 144.]
THE STATE EX REL. UNITED SCREW & BOLT CORPORATION, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE; GATSON, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. United Screw & Bolt Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-160.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed. (No. 96-2304—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.)
APPEALS and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD08-1024. __________________ Calfee, Halter & Griswold L.L.P. and William L.S. Ross, for appellee and cross-appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and David J. Kovach, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant and cross-appellee.
Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy and Marc J. Jaffy; Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.
COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I dissent and would affirm the court of appeals.
COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.