State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 137.]
THE STATE EX REL. ROY, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-148.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2673—Submitted July 15, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD11-1459. __________________ Sheerer & Pitts Co., L.P.A., and Thomas R. Pitts, for appellee.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Mary Ann O. Rini, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
COOK, J., dissents. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.