Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

State ex rel. Gibson v. Indus. Comm.

State ex rel. Gibson v. Indus. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 16, 1998
1998 Ohio 138; 83 Ohio St. 3d 128

State ex rel. Gibson v. Indus. Comm.

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 128.]

THE STATE EX REL. GIBSON, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Gibson v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-138.]

Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 97-469—Submitted July 15, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD03-345. __________________ Law Offices of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jonathan A. Good, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Gibson & Robbins-Penniman and Kelly A. Willis, for appellee Act-I Temporaries. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.

RESNICK, J., dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.