State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 382.]
THE STATE EX REL. YOUNG, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-398.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-427—Submitted June 9, 1998—Decided July 22, 1998.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD02-217. __________________ Hochman & Roach Co., L.P.A., Gary D. Plunkett and Kaila A. Cox, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William D. Haders, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.