Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

FOE Aerie 0582 Twin City v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.

FOE Aerie 0582 Twin City v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1998
1998 Ohio 240; 82 Ohio St. 3d 263

FOE Aerie 0582 Twin City v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 263.]

FOE AERIE 0582 TWIN CITY, APPELLEE, v. OHIO LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, APPELLANT. [Cite as FOE Aerie 0582 Twin City v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 1998-Ohio-240.]

Search and seizure—Peace officers and authorized agents or employees of Department of Liquor Control need not identify themselves prior to entry to liquor permit premises, when—Reasonable expectation of privacy in liquor permit premises is minimal. (No. 97-2100—Submitted June 10, 1998—Decided July 1, 1998.)

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APE03-339. __________________ Fawley & Associates, Darrell E. Fawley, Jr. and Kurt O. Gearhiser, for appellee.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Barbara A. Serve, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of AL Post 763 v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 108, 694 N.E.2d 905.

MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.