State ex rel. ON Environmental Serv. v. Indus. Comm.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
[THE STATE EX REL.] ON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. ON Environmental Serv. v. Indus. Comm. (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.]
Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.
(No. 97-1613 — Submitted October 27, 1998 — Decided December 30, 1998.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD07-908.
__________________
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.P.A., George H. Rosin and Grant M. Yoakum, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.
Brian & Brian and Richard F. Brian, for appellee Michelle K. Berns.
__________________
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY and COOK, JJ., concur.
RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
__________________
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals on the basis that the landfill operation does not qualify as “construction.” Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.