Ruge v. Conrad
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Ruge v. Conrad (Ohio 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
RUGE, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. CONRAD, ADMR., ET AL., APPELLEES
AND CROSS-APPELLANTS; NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
CORPORATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Ruge v. Conrad (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 97-2328 — Submitted October 14, 1998 at the Mercer County Session —
Decided December 30, 1998.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clark County, No.
97CA0015. __________________
Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy, Marc J. Jaffy and Eric S. Bravo, for appellant and cross-appellee.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michael A. Vanderhorst, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees and cross-appellants Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, and Industrial Commission.
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Joseph A. Brunetto, for appellee Navistar International Transportation Corp.
__________________ The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. The court orders that the court of appeals’ opinion not be published in the
Ohio Official Reports, and that it may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
COOK, J., dissents.
__________________ COOK, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the decision to dismiss this case as improvidently allowed and, if addressing this case on the merits, would affirm the decision of the court of appeals.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.