Ruge v. Conrad
Ohio Supreme Court
Ruge v. Conrad, 1998 Ohio 536 (Ohio 1998)
Per Curiam
Ruge v. Conrad
Opinion
RUGE, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. CONRAD, ADMR., ET AL., APPELLEES
AND CROSS-APPELLANTS; NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
CORPORATION, APPELLEE.
[Cite as Ruge v. Conrad (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.]
Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.
(No. 97-2328 — Submitted October 14, 1998 at the Mercer County Session —
Decided December 30, 1998.)
APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clark County, No.
97CA0015.
__________________
Stewart Jaffy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jaffy, Marc J. Jaffy and
Eric S. Bravo, for appellant and cross-appellee.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michael A. Vanderhorst,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellees and cross-appellants Administrator,
Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, and Industrial Commission.
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Joseph A. Brunetto, for appellee
Navistar International Transportation Corp.
__________________
The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
The court orders that the court of appeals’ opinion not be published in the
Ohio Official Reports, and that it may not be cited as authority except by the
parties inter se.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG
STRATTON, JJ., concur.
COOK, J., dissents.
__________________
COOK, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the decision to dismiss this
case as improvidently allowed and, if addressing this case on the merits, would
affirm the decision of the court of appeals.
2
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published