Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

Bakos v. Insura Property & Casualty Insurance

Bakos v. Insura Property & Casualty Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 30, 1998 · Moyer, Douglas, Resnick, Sweeney, Pfeifer, Stratton, Cook
1998 Ohio 537; 84 Ohio St. 3d 1219
Bakos v. Insura Property & Casualty Insurance

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

BAKOS, APPELLEE, v. INSURA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL.,

APPELLANTS.

[Cite as Bakos v. Insura Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Certification of conflict dismissed for want of conflict within meaning of

S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). (No. 97-2431 — Submitted October 28, 1998 — Decided December 30, 1998.)

CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 71949.

__________________

Peterson & Zelasko and Bradford D. Zelasko, for appellee. McNeal, Schick, Archibald & Biro Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Ziegler, for appellant Insura Property & Casualty Insurance Company.

Weston Hurd Fallon Paisley & Howley L.L.P., John G. Farnan, Hilary S. Taylor and William H. Baughman, Jr., for appellant St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company.

__________________

The cause is dismissed for want of conflict within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B).

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER AND LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., CONCUR.

COOK, J., dissents.

__________________

COOK, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the decision to dismiss this case as improvidently certified and, if addressing this case on the merits, would affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.