Disciplinary Counsel v. Eisenberg
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Hutchins (Ohio 2004)
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. McMahon (Ohio 2007)
- Portage County Bar Ass'n v. Mitchell (Ohio 2003)
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Kinney (Ohio 2000)
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Kramer (Ohio 2000)
- Toledo Bar Assn. v. Kramer (Ohio 2000)
- Dayton Bar Assn. v. Kinney (Ohio 2000)
- Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Pincura (Ohio 1999)
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Herzog (Ohio 1999)
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Herzog (Ohio 1999)
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Eisenberg (Ohio 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
After review of the record, we adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. We said in Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 187, 190, 658 N.E.2d 237, 240, and recently repeated in Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Knowlton (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 76, 689 N.E.2d 538, and Disciplinary Counsel v. Bandy (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 291, 690 N.E.2d 1280, “[w]hen an attorney engages in a course of conduct resulting in a finding that the attorney has violated DR 1-102(A)(4), the attorney will be actually suspended from the practice of law for an appropriate period of time.” But, as the board found here, respondent’s action was an isolated incident in an otherwise unblemished legal career and not a course of conduct. We therefore adopt the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.