Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

State v. Wilhelm

State v. Wilhelm
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 22, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
81 Ohio St. 3d 444; 692 N.E.2d 181
State v. Wilhelm

Cases that cite this one

43 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Dayton v. Erickson (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 3, 665 N.E.2d 1091.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Dissenting Opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinión in Dayton v. Erickson (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 3, 12-13. 665 N.E.2d 1091, 1098.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.