State v. Wilhelm
State v. Wilhelm
81 Ohio St. 3d 444; 692 N.E.2d 181
Cases that cite this one
43 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State v. Hicks, Unpublished Decision (6-19-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- State, City of Nelsonville v. Woodrum, Unpublished Decision (11-20-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
- State v. Hodge (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- State v. Denton-Boyer, Unpublished Decision (5-26-1998) (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)
- State v. Hubbard (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- State v. Andrews (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. McEldowney, 06-Ca-138 (12-14-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
- State v. Alemu, Unpublished Decision (10-31-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
- State v. Kellough, Unpublished Decision (4-29-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
- State v. Gross, Unpublished Decision (6-27-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- State v. Stevens, Unpublished Decision (8-30-2000) (Ohio Ct. App. 2000)
- State v. Bralek (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State v. Brooks (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Hahn (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Randhan (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
- State v. Mack, 24328 (3-11-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
- State v. Blair, 24208 (12-3-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
- State v. Barbee, 07ca009183 (7-21-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
- State v. Hale, Unpublished Decision (1-13-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
- State v. Johnson, Unpublished Decision (6-30-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
- State v. Schwieterman, Unpublished Decision (2-7-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
- State v. Bell, Unpublished Decision (2-11-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- State v. Lazenby, Unpublished Decision (3-25-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- State v. Levkulich, Unpublished Decision (6-26-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- State v. Williams, Unpublished Decision (6-18-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Dayton v. Erickson (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 3, 665 N.E.2d 1091.
Dissenting Opinion
dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinión in Dayton v. Erickson (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 3, 12-13. 665 N.E.2d 1091, 1098.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.