Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 23, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

81 Ohio St. 3d 1257; 691 N.E.2d 1051

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat (Ohio 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

IT IS ORDERED by this court that James C. Dukat, a.k.a. James Charles Dukat, be and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be *1258made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier cases, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 189, 680 N.E.2d 972; and Disciplinary Counsel v. Dukat (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 1495, 683 N.E.2d 1150.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.