Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 10, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

82 Ohio St. 3d 100; 694 N.E.2d 899

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Roemer (Ohio 1999)
Cleveland Bar Ass'n. v. Rollins (Ohio 1999)
Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Curry (Ohio 1999)
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Verbiski (Ohio 1999)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Farah (Ohio 2013)
Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Verbiski (Ohio 1999)
Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Curry (Ohio 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (Ohio 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. We also note that in August 1994, we suspended respondent for eighteen *102months, but stayed the suspension on the condition, among others, that he spend the entire time on probation under the guidance of a monitor. Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 75, 637 N.E.2d 296.

Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.