Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

State ex rel. Pearson v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 17, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

82 Ohio St. 3d 180; 694 N.E.2d 965

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Pearson v. Indus. Comm. (Ohio 1998)
State ex rel. Pearson v. Indus. Comm. (Ohio 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Dissenting Opinion

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and grant relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666, by ordering the Industrial Commission to allow compensation for permanent total disability.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.