Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

State ex rel. Chaffins v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

82 Ohio St. 3d 268; 695 N.E.2d 253

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Chaffins v. Indus. Comm (Ohio 1998)
State Ex Rel. Caudill v. Ind. Comm., Ohio, Unpublished Decision (5-21-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Industrial Commission, Unpublished Decision (9-9-1999) (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
State ex rel. Chaffins v. Indus. Comm. (Ohio 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In State ex rel Nicholls v. Indus. Comm. (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 454, 692 N.E.2d 188, we held that the possibility of unspecified error is not a proper basis for the exercise of reconsideration jurisdiction. The commission, therefore, abused its discretion in vacating the August 2,1993 regional board and October 6, 1993 staff hearing officers’ orders in which wage loss compensation was awarded. Given this determination, we find it unnecessary to address claimant’s remaining propositions.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the writ is granted.

Judgment reversed and writ granted.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.