Tucker v. McAninch
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Goodykoontz v. Hunter-Stuff (Ohio Ct. App. 2026)
- Billman v. Meintel (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
- Tayse v. Erdos (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
- Small v. Collins (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- Billman v. Smith (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- Albrecht v. Franklin Cty. Court of Appeals (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- Bradley v. Hooks (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. Wright (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- Wilson v. Hudson (Ohio 2010)
- Bollar v. Eberlin (Ohio 2009)
- Smith v. Pavicic, Unpublished Decision (3-19-2001) (Ohio Ct. App. 2001)
- State ex rel. Bray v. Brigano (Ohio 2001)
- State ex rel. Bray v. Brigano (Ohio 2001)
- Prather v. Brigano (Ohio 1999)
- Prather v. Brigano (Ohio 1999)
- Goodykoontz v. Harris (Ohio Ct. App. 2025)
- Tucker v. McAninch (Ohio 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the following reasons. First, Tucker did not attach commitment papers pertinent to his claim challenging the APA’s parole revocation. State ex rel. Brantley v. Ghee (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 287, 288, 685 N.E.2d 1243, 1244. Second, “ ‘[a]s long as an unreasonable delay has not occurred, the remedy for noncompliance with the Morrissey parole-revocation due process requirements is a new hearing, not outright release from prison.’ ” State ex rel. Carrion v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (1998), 80 Ohio St.3d 637, 638, 687 N.E.2d 759, 760, quoting State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaul
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.