Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

Wright v. Money

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 29, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

82 Ohio St. 3d 424; 696 N.E.2d 596; 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1869

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

In re J.G. (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
Wright v. Money (Ohio 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. The documentation attached to Wright’s petition established that he was convicted and sentenced by the general division of the common pleas court rather than the probate division. Although his trial court judge might have normally been a probate division judge, the docket of journal entries indicates his assignment to preside over the criminal case in the general division. *425See, e.g., Sup.R. 3(B)(2), which permits presiding judges of common pleas courts to assign judges of the court “on a temporary basis to serve in another division of the court as required by the business of the court.”

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.