In re Rutherford

Ohio Supreme Court
In re Rutherford, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1211 (Ohio 1998)
693 N.E.2d 1087; 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1382
Cook, Douglas, Lundberg, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

In re Rutherford

Opinion of the Court

On March 6,1998, this court suspended respondent, Guy Rutherford, a.k.a. Guy Darius Rutherford, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On *1212April 17, 1998, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted an entry pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(l)(c), notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child support order previously submitted to the court. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Guy Rutherford, a.k.a. Guy Darius Rutherford, Attorney Registration No. 0066032, be reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see In re Rutherford (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 1254, 691 N.E.2d 1049.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg - Stratton, JJ., concur.

Reference

Status
Published