Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

In re Rutherford

In re Rutherford
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 6, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Lundberg, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
82 Ohio St. 3d 1211; 693 N.E.2d 1087; 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1382

In re Rutherford

Opinion of the Court

On March 6,1998, this court suspended respondent, Guy Rutherford, a.k.a. Guy Darius Rutherford, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On *1212April 17, 1998, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted an entry pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(l)(c), notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child support order previously submitted to the court. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Guy Rutherford, a.k.a. Guy Darius Rutherford, Attorney Registration No. 0066032, be reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see In re Rutherford (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 1254, 691 N.E.2d 1049.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg - Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.