Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

State ex rel. Dayton Walther Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 16, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

83 Ohio St. 3d 120; 698 N.E.2d 985

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State ex rel. Dayton Walther Corp. v. Indus. Comm. (Ohio 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Concurring in Part

Douglas, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. I would affirm, in part, the judgment of the court of appeals and reverse, in part, the judgment of the court of appeals. In so doing, I would reinstate the order of the commission.

F.E. Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.