Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

State ex rel. Dayton Walther Corp. v. Industrial Commission

State ex rel. Dayton Walther Corp. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 16, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
83 Ohio St. 3d 120; 698 N.E.2d 985

State ex rel. Dayton Walther Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Concurring in Part

Douglas, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. I would affirm, in part, the judgment of the court of appeals and reverse, in part, the judgment of the court of appeals. In so doing, I would reinstate the order of the commission.

F.E. Sweeney, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑