Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

State ex rel. Thompson v. Industrial Commission

State ex rel. Thompson v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 23, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
83 Ohio St. 3d 210; 699 N.E.2d 88

State ex rel. Thompson v. Industrial Commission

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent. *211Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Moyer, C.J., dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority decision. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent and would deny the writ, and return the matter to the Industrial Commission for reconsideration.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.