Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 23, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
83 Ohio St. 3d 222; 699 N.E.2d 458
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Meros

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for eighteen months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.