Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Romaniw

Ohio Supreme Court
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Romaniw, 83 Ohio St. 3d 462 (Ohio 1998)
700 N.E.2d 858
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Romaniw

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

As we said in Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Belock (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 98, 100, 694 N.E.2d 897, 899, β€œThe continuing public confidence in the judicial system and the bar requires that the strictest discipline be imposed in misappropriation cases.” We find no mitigating circumstances here that would justify an exception to that principle. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Reference

Cited By
9 cases
Status
Published