Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

Jones v. Suster.

Jones v. Suster.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 24, 1998 · Arguments, Audiotapes, Because, Douglas, Grant, Knepper, Moot, Motion, Pfeifer, Received, Request, Resnick, Reviewed, Sixth, Stratton, Sweeney, Visiting
83 Ohio St. 3d 1437; 699 N.E.2d 950; 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2716

Jones v. Suster.

Opinion of the Court

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for oral hearing,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for oral hearing be, and hereby is, denied.

F.E. Sweeney, J., concurs because the request is moot. Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs because Visiting Judge Knepper has received and reviewed the audiotapes of the January 13,1998 oral arguments. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion. Richard W. Knepper, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for Pfeifer, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.