Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 10, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Respondent, Stayed, Stratton, Sweeney, Years

84 Ohio St. 3d 1; 701 N.E.2d 681

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown (Ohio 2001)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown (Ohio 2001)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown (Ohio 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of the board and its conclusions that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules as charged. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended- from the practice of law. A condition of respondent’s possible reinstatement will be evidence of compliance with his contract with OLAP. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., would suspend respondent for two years with one year stayed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.