Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lockhart
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Lockhart
Opinion of the Court
We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Respondent’s shoplifting violated DR 1-102(A)(4). Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fidler (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 396, 700 N.E.2d 323.
Judgment accordingly.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. In accordance with the recommendation of the board, I would indefinitely suspend the respondent.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Toledo Bar Association v. Lockhart
- Cited By
- 7 cases
- Status
- Published