State v. Lance

Ohio Supreme Court November 25, 1998

State v. Lance, 84 Ohio St. 3d 17 (Ohio 1998)

701 N.E.2d 692; 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3207

Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

*18Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V are dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in part and dissent in part.

Concurring in Part

Cook, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. I dissent from the dismissal of Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State of Ohio v. Lance
Cited By: 18 cases
Status: Published