Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

State v. Lance

State v. Lance
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 25, 1998 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
84 Ohio St. 3d 17; 701 N.E.2d 692; 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3207

State v. Lance

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

*18Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V are dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in part and dissent in part.

Concurring in Part

Cook, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. I dissent from the dismissal of Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑