Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Buren
Ohio Supreme Court
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Buren, 84 Ohio St. 3d 271 (Ohio 1998)
703 N.E.2d 767
Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Buren
Opinion of the Court
We concur with the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Burén engaged in a continuing course of deceit, misrepresentation, and neglect of duty to his clients and the bankruptcy court. In addition, Burén has failed to cooperate with disciplinary proceedings. Under these circumstances, disbarment is the appropriate sanction. See, e.g., Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Churilla (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 348, 350, 678 N.E.2d 515, 516-517;
Judgment accordingly.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Dayton Bar Association v. Buren
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published