Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.
Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.
84 Ohio St. 3d 1403; 701 N.E.2d 1015; 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3340
Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.
Opinion of the Court
Certified State Law Question, No. C2980227. This cause came before the court on the certification of a state law question from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. On November 12, 1998, petitioner filed a reply brief that was due November 2,1998, under S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(7). Whereas S.CtPrac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the untimely filing of a brief,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that petitioner’s reply brief be, and hereby is, stricken.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.