Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.
Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.
84 Ohio St. 3d 1403; 701 N.E.2d 1015; 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3340
Opinion of the Court
Certified State Law Question, No. C2980227. This cause came before the court on the certification of a state law question from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. On November 12, 1998, petitioner filed a reply brief that was due November 2,1998, under S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(7). Whereas S.CtPrac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the untimely filing of a brief,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that petitioner’s reply brief be, and hereby is, stricken.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.