Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

Reed v. Kinkela

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 9, 1998 · Dismiss, Douglas, Resnick, Stratton

84 Ohio St. 3d 1427; 702 N.E.2d 903; 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3389

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Sidle v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (Ohio 2000)
State ex rel. Bradford v. Bowen (Ohio 2023)
Pruitt v. Cook (Ohio 2013)
In re Broom (Ohio 2009)
Dunn v. Smith (Ohio 2008)
Carrion v. Beightler (Ohio 2008)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, writ allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. *1428See Workman v. Warden (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 1479, 687 N.E.2d 474; Pegan v. Crawmer (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 607, 609, 653 N.E.2d 659, 661. Respondents are ordered to file a return of writ within thirty days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within twenty days after the return. Petitioner’s physical presence before this court is not required. Gaskins v. Shiplevy (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 380, 382, 667 N.E.2d 1194, 1196.

Douglas, Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent and would dismiss this cause.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.