Ohio Supreme Court, 1998

State ex rel. Licking Cty. v. Licking Mem. Hosp

State ex rel. Licking Cty. v. Licking Mem. Hosp
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 19, 1998
83 Ohio St. 3d 1459; 700 N.E.2d 877; 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2986

State ex rel. Licking Cty. v. Licking Mem. Hosp

Opinion

98-1733.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On October 5,1998, respondent filed a motion for leave to file a reply to relators’ memorandum contra respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Whereas S.CtPrae.R. XI(4) prohibits a reply to a memorandum opposing a motion,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file a reply to relators’ memorandum contra respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be, and hereby is, denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.