State ex rel. Rainey v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Rainey v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 45.]
THE STATE EX REL. RAINEY, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Rainey v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-221.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-2614—Submitted August 25, 1999—Decided October 13, 1999.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD08-1124. __________________ Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Angela D. Marinakis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.