State ex rel. Hutchinson v. Indus. Comm.
State ex rel. Hutchinson v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 42.]
THE STATE EX REL. HUTCHINSON, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Hutchinson v. Indus. Comm., 1999-Ohio-223.]
Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-43—Submitted August 25, 1999—Decided October 13, 1999.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD12-1677. __________________ Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Cecille Caluya Harris, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.
Willacy, LoPresti & Marcovy, Salvatore J. LoPresti and Sherri Neiding McComas, for appellee Cyclops Corporation, n.k.a. Armco, Inc. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.